24.10.2008
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services said Tuesday it raised its long-term ratings on Monsanto Co. because of the seed and herbicide maker’s solid market position, strong demand for its products and high research and development spending. Standard & Poor’s increased the ratings on Monsanto, the world’s largest seed maker, to ’A+’ from ’A.’ It also affirmed the St. Louis-based company’s ’A-1’ short-term ratings. All of the ratings are investment grade.
24.10.2008
Scientists in Uganda will soon begin testing the genetically modified cotton in their laboratories to prove whether they are resistant to cotton wilt and other related cotton diseases, which has been destroying the conventional cotton plant. The government recently gave a go ahead for scientists to carry out the above research just as they have been doing to other crops such as the East African Highland banana and cassava.
24.10.2008
The government is considering a multinational company’s offer of selling its Bt cotton by paying a seed subsidy of $247 million (Rs19 billion) annually, The News has learnt. [...] Earlier, Punjab government was also interested in getting Bollguard-I technology, an obsolete technology, by paying Rs5 billion but it was blocked by the opposition from the federal government. The company also requested MINFAL to completely ban the existing Bt varieties in the local market, thus having a monopoly of this multinational company, another official familiar with the development told this correspondent.
24.10.2008
A long standing land dispute in Brazil between landless workers movements and a Swiss multinational, which led to the deaths of two men, has been brought to a conclusion. Agrochemical business Syngenta has handed over its experimental farm in Paraná state to the state government, marking an end to violent conflict over the site. Syngenta gave the land to the Paraná state government on 14 October 2008. The government has promised to use the land for the production of native seeds for distribution to small holder farmers and impoverished countries who have suffered devastation from hurricanes.
23.10.2008
There are 6.6 billion people in the world and the population is growing at a rapid pace. Ken Hobbie, U.S. Grains Council president and CEO said almost 20 percent (1.3 billion) of the total population live on less than one dollar a day. ”That’s one in every five people living on less than $365 a year,” said Hobbie. ”These statistics make clear the absolute need to continue boosting global livestock and poultry sectors to feed the growing population. At the same time, they reinforce the critical need to educate international biotechnology regulators about the important role biotechnology plays in feeding a hungry world.”
23.10.2008
As the world considers how to respond, the debate about genetically modified (GM) crops has inevitably reared its ugly head. ’Ugly’ because the public exchange about this technology has usually seen extreme viewpoints gaining the most airtime. For example, in the United Kingdom, Prince Charles’ spirited but ill-informed attack on GM crops this summer led to a flurry of opinionated responses. We could have been back in the polarised debates of the earlier part of this decade.
23.10.2008
This year, much of the nation’s Corn Belt suffered from above-normal wet weather that either caused planting delays or flooded fields, forcing farmers to replant. [...] But despite the rain, Nebraska’s corn crop is forecast at 1.39 billion bushels. Yield is forecast at 161 bushels per acre, four bushels above last month’s forecast and the second highest of record, 5 bushels below the previous high set in 2004. The reason for the high productivity is biotechnology crops, according to a new study from grain crop specialists and entomologists at the University of Kentucky.
23.10.2008
Delays in authorising GM traits in feed and a zero tolerance on non-authorised material has accounted for about 15% of the losses incurred by the livestock sector - some 2,500 million Euros in the past year, according to a report sent to European Commission President Dr José Manuel Barroso. The case study report, prepared by COCERAL, FEFAC and UECBV with UK input from the Agricultural Industries Confederation, recognises that the poor harvest in 2007 was a key problem, but the inability to import feedstuffs from around the world also had a significant impact.
23.10.2008
26. Be it further resolved that we consider genetic modification and the potential contamination of our landraces by GE technology a continuation of genocide upon indigenous people and as malicious and sacrilegious acts toward our ancestry, culture, and future generations.
27. Be it further resolved that we object to the cultivation of GE seeds in general but especially within range of our traditional agricultural systems that can lead to the contamination of our seeds, wild plants, traditional foods, and cultural property.
28. Be it further resolved that we will work with each other, local, tribal, and state governments to create zones that will be free of genetically engineered and transgenic organisms.
23.10.2008
Scientists believe genetically modified chile seeds could be the answer to the crop’s woes. But farmers like Brascoupe fear the changes could affect traditional communities, family farms and the future of the chile itself. In fact, two years ago, the New Mexico Acequia Association and the Traditional Native American Farmers Association drafted ”A Declaration of Seed Sovereignty: A living document for New Mexico.”
22.10.2008
Genetically engineered crops are prohibited in Lake County after a 3-2 vote by the Lake County Board of Supervisors Tuesday. Supervisors Rob Brown and Jeff Smith voted against the ban. The vote came after three and a half hours of discussion. The board took input on both sides of the issue from farmers, business owners and representatives from the Lake County Farm Bureau, Lake County Agricultural Department, Lake County Sierra Club, Lakeport Regional Chamber of Commerce and California Certified Organic Farmers.
22.10.2008
EU envrionment ministers continued to disagree on whether member states should be allowed to establish GMO-free zones for sensitive areas, although they did concur on the need for better long-term environmental risk assessment of GMOs. Following a number of informal discussions earlier this summer, the EU-27 environment ministers debated the bloc’s GMO authorisation procedure in a Council meeting on 20 October. But member states clashed on the issues of protecting sensitive and protected territories and establishing GMO-free zones.
22.10.2008
Italy should lift a ban on growing genetically modified crops, Welfare and Health Minister Maurizio Sacconi said on Monday. ’I think it’s time to lift this de facto moratorium which has been in place for many years,’ Sacconi told reporters on the sidelines of an international food forum. Italy does not grow GM crops and opposes use of GM products because of concerns that crops whose genes have been altered, for example to provide higher yields, might contain hidden risks to health or the natural environment.
22.10.2008
Europe’s food safety chief said on Thursday she did not believe there was any need to change the European Union’s ”zero tolerance” policy on unauthorised genetically modified material in food imports. [...] ”My cabinet advises me that there is no need at this point to change the zero tolerance because we have already approved one event, we are in the process of approving a second event.
22.10.2008
After ten years of field testing at a dozen locations, the researchers are confident that farmers would use less pesticide with GM rice strains. But David Andow, an entomologist at the University of Minnesota in St Paul, says he is unconvinced. In the past few decades, the stem borer has been overtaken by another pest, the brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens), which wreaks havoc every spring and has become the main concern of farmers in Asia. Bt and CpTI toxins have no effect on the insect.
22.10.2008
Courtesy of the American-based seed conglomerate Monsanto, Egypt has begun planting its first genetically modified crop. [...] But because there is no enforcement mechanism for the Cartagena Protocol — which automatically assumes national law status in Egypt — and because there is confusion about the proper way to register a seed, El-Tayeb says Monsanto was able to certify MON 810 without submitting a comprehensive biosafety dossier or proper assessment of its trials to the relevant authorities.
21.10.2008
East Gippsland Shire Council last night supported an approach to State Government for East Gippsland to be declared a zone free of Genetically Modified crops. The agreement was reached following extensive debate on a motion put by Cr Jane Rowe that Council.
21.10.2008
The 5000-odd hectares of genetically modified (GM) canola crops planted in NSW this year following the lifting of the embargo on commercial production are reportedly performing well for the growers involved. [...] Central NSW sales manager for Pioneer Hi-Bred, John De Lyall, said grower feedback on the company’s GM canola hybrid, 46Y20, was that it was ”absolutely fantastic”. ”It’s going so well, not because it’s GM, but because it’s a hybrid.
21.10.2008
Gene Ethics’ has released a map of Genetically Modified (GM) Roundup tolerant canola sites and GM canola depots in NSW. The map shows the GM Canola is being grown in the Cowra district and was published this month with information gleaned from media reports. ”Our map will help protect GM-free grain growers, beekeepers and harvesters from GM contamination,” says Bob Phelps, Executive Director of Gene Ethics.
21.10.2008
Growers of genetically modified canola will need to set up buffer zones of just 5m to keep the GM crops away from regular varieties if WA follows national industry guidelines, sparking fears of contamination if the State adopts the controversial technology. As the new State Government prepares for large scale trials of GM canola, possibly by next year, critics of the technology warned yesterday contamination of non-GM crops would be inevitable if industry was allowed to ”self-regulate” segregation. Network of Concerned Farmers spokeswoman Julie Newman said that as a result, farmers would not be able to promise consumers that their crops were entirely free of GM seed.